|
Articles
Running
Longer Faster
Where do fast distance runners come from? It’s interesting
to note the development of distance runners. You won’t
find many examples of runners who go out running marathons
and end up getting faster at all other distances later (unless
of course they weren’t in good condition in the first
place). You will however find that if you get fast at the
shorter distances that faster marathons will follow.
Though
most elite distance runners gravitate towards longer races
because they are comparatively slower than others in the shorter
events, they are not slow. Fast distance runners are also
fast at shorter events. It would be hard to find a 2:10 marathoner
who cannot run a mile under 4:05. In fact many if not most
are sub-four minute mile capable. Now, to most of us mere
mortals that seems to be plenty fast to keep racing at the
mile but, remember, seconds are an eternity at that level.
So, why do they move to the marathon? Because, a 3:57 mile
leaves them out of contention with the fastest of the milers
(all sub-3:50).
A
key reason for their speed at the longer distances is because
they developed their speed before graduating to those long
races. Look at most of the top level 10K races and longer,
and despite the race distance, the victor will be the one
with the most speed. This holds true in local races on up
through world class championships or Olympics. (Remember,
nobody, but NOBODY beats us in the last mile.)
The
best runners in the world are able to run a sub-4:00 mile
for the last mile of the 5000 and sub-4:10 in the last mile
of the 10,000. There are miles in the marathon run in the
4:20s – and they are under control! That speed did not
happen through long slow distance. 30 years ago we used to
think so. But that has long since been disproven.
Let’s
look at a few elite examples:
Dan Browne PRs: 5,000m 13:28.24 (1998); 10,000m 27:47:04
(2002); Marathon 2:11:35 (2002)
Alan Culpepper PRs: 1500m 3:38.64 (1999); 5000m 13:27.52
(2002); 10,000m 27:33.93 (2001); Marathon 2:09:41 (2002)
Meb Keflezighi PRs: 1500, 3:42.29 (1998); 5,000 13:11.77
(2000); 10,000 27:13.98 AR (2001) Marathon 2:10:03 (2003).
Deena Kastor PRs: 3,000m - 8:42.59 (2000); 5,000m - 14:45.62
(2000);
10,000m – 30:50.32 (2002AR); Marathon – 2:21:16AR
(2003)
Marla Runyan (long-time miler before attempting the marathon)
PRs: 1500m - 4:02.95 (2002); 3000m - 8:39.36 (2002); 5000m
- 14:59.20 (2004) AR; Marathon - 2:27:10 (2002)
Certainly
you want to play to your strengths mentally and physically.
And, it is true that longer runs and higher mileages (built
up over time) develop staying power in races. In the end however,
the edge will go to the runner who has speed-training background.
So
what is the smarter approach? First, speed training is not
an afterthought - “I’ll-fit-some-in-close-to-a-race”
approach. Doing some kind of long run “base training”
is antiquated thinking. Speed work, in its various forms,
should be run year round. It is a PART of base training. It
is integral to better distance running.
Second,
it is not advisable to start running marathons or half-marathons
and then work on shorter-faster events. True, you can do this.
It is simply the reverse of what has been shown to work best.
Run those 5Ks and 10ks or track events when you can find them.
Get good at those. Then move up in distance. It’s a
strength and stamina issue after you develop your speed. Keep
building your race distances after getting fast at them.
Last
year, I spoke with Steve Jones (2:07:13 former marathon world
record holder). I asked him, which is more important in his
opinion: training fast or training long. His answer was immediate
– get fast first, then go long.
And
finally, this is why as general advice I do not advocate taking
on marathons or half-marathons as your first endeavors into
running. The pounding takes its toll on novice runners and
puts them at far greater risks for injuries. Ideally, marathons
should not be run in your first year (or more) of serious
running. Get good at the shorter stuff. Have some fun. Build
up to running longer faster.
Upward
and Onward!
|